Accesion Strategy

Dept 37 - Economic Policy Department
Dept 37 - Economic Policy Department


  • Euro-area Accession Strategy

Principal documents for the Czech Republic's Euro-area Accession Strategy.

The Czech Republic’s Updated Euro-area Accession Strategy - 2007

(Joint Document of the Czech Government and the Czech National Bank)


The Czech Republic has participated in the third stage of economic and monetary union (EMU) since its accession to the European Union (EU), when it acquired the status of a Member State with a derogation regarding the adoption of the euro. Consequently, it is not yet a member of the euro area, but has committed itself to introducing the euro and joining the euro area in the future. It is, therefore, vital to have in place a euro adoption strategy serving as a basis for each particular economic policy.

Accordingly, the Government approved The Czech Republic’s Euro-area Accession Strategy in 2003, a document drawn up in cooperation with the Czech National Bank (CNB). As the original Strategy has not been fulfilled, the Government of the Czech Republic and the CNB are presenting an update of the document. This update takes into account domestic and external developments since the original text was approved. Like the original document, it presents the joint and coordinated approach of the Government of the Czech Republic and the CNB to the future adoption of the euro.

Assessment of the Czech Republic’s 2003 Euro-area Accession Strategy and past fulfilment of the convergence criteria

The Czech Republic’s 2003 Euro-area Accession Strategy (hereinafter the “Strategy”) summarised the starting points of the nation’s integration into the euro area and discussed the expected benefits and risks. The document recommended that the Czech Republic join the euro area “... as soon as economic conditions allow for doing so”. The timing of entry depended on the speed of real and nominal convergence of the Czech economy to the euro area economies. Provided that the Maastricht criteria were fulfilled (including a successful consolidation of public finances), a sufficient level of real convergence was achieved and adequate progress was made with structural reforms guaranteeing sufficient economic alignment with the euro area countries, the document expected the Czech Republic to join the euro area around 2009–2010.

The Strategy also defined the conditions of entry and the approximate length of stay in ERM II, subject to fulfilment of the exchange rate convergence criterion in the Czech economy1.  The Strategy stated that the Czech Republic would stay in ERM II for the minimum possible period 2.  It would enter ERM II only after conditions had been established enabling it to adopt the single currency and then benefit from its introduction without experiencing any problems, i.e. only after progress had been achieved in preparing and implementing reforms of public finances and after other reforms had been adopted to increase the flexibility of the Czech economy, and especially the labour market. Such reforms were vital not only because of the adoption of the euro, but also for their own sake, as they were a precondition for the further sound development of the Czech economy.

In the Strategy, the Government and the CNB committed themselves to annually assessing the preparedness of the Czech Republic for euro-area accession, with reference to the current and expected fulfilment of the Maastricht convergence criteria and economic alignment with the euro area. The assessment would result in a recommendation to the Government on whether to initiate the procedure that will take the koruna into ERM II in the year following the assessment. All three assessments conducted since the approval of the Strategy have resulted in a recommendation for the Government not to attempt to enter ERM II the following year. The negative recommendation contained in the most recent assessment, conducted in October 2006, means that the Czech Republic’s future accession to the euro area has been postponed beyond the horizon of 2009–2010 envisaged in the original Strategy.

The excessive deficit procedure was opened against the Czech Republic on its accession to the EU, owing to its high public budget deficits. This was aimed at reducing the public finance deficit in a sustainable and credible manner below 3% of GDP before 2008. The plan for a gradual reduction in the deficit was endorsed by the EU authorities on the basis of the Convergence Programme submitted by the Government in May 2004. The plan was built on the fiscal targets of the public finance reform approved by the Government in 2003.

This fiscal reform, or consolidation programme, was based on cutting public expenditure and modestly increasing the overall tax quota. This was complemented by a change to the institutional setup introducing medium-term fiscal targeting anchored by medium-term spending frameworks. The reform successfully started a restructuring of the revenue side of public budgets. However, the original aims on the expenditure side were abandoned and the measures taken had only a short-term impact. Moreover, the new medium-term expenditure ceilings have been exceeded several times since 2005. The additional income stemming from rapid economic growth was used to increase expenditure rather than to reduce the deficit. The Government thus failed to take advantage of the rapid economic growth to consolidate expenditure in a sustainable manner. Nevertheless, thanks to the good economic situation and to overestimation of the spending plans of individual ministries (manifesting itself in transfers to reserve funds), the original – albeit none-too-ambitious – deficit reduction strategy was fulfilled.

However, this trend was interrupted in 2007 owing to a large increase in social expenditure resulting from the 2006 pre-election measures, leading to procyclical fiscal policy. The 2007 consolidation programme’s original target of 3.3% of GDP is thus not likely to be met and the Czech Republic is thus unable to end the excessive deficit procedure within the stipulated deadline. The existence of the excessive deficit procedure creates a legal impediment to entry into the euro area, as it implies non-fulfilment of the fiscal convergence criterion. Moreover, the current state of public finances is hampering their stabilising effect over the economic cycle.

Unlike the criterion on the general government position, the Czech Republic is compliant with the Maastricht criterion on government debt. Although the government debt recorded significant growth up until 2003, its ratio to GDP was only 30.1% in 2006, as compared to the reference value of 60%, thanks to its relatively low starting level. It has stabilised roughly at this level since then and is not expected to rise substantially in the near future. Fulfilment of the criterion should thus not be in jeopardy at the expected euro adoption horizon. From the long-term perspective, though, significant upward pressure might be exerted on the government debt if fundamental reforms of the pension and health care systems fail to be delivered.

The Czech Republic has been compliant with the Maastricht price stability criterion in recent years. Domestic inflation has long been low, reflecting among other things the successful anchoring of inflation expectations by CNB monetary policy. However, the current outlook for inflation suggests that the reference value for the price stability criterion is likely to be exceeded in 2007 and 2008, mainly because of changes to indirect taxes. Once this one-off shock arising from administrative measures has unwound, inflation will return to lower levels.

The Czech Republic has also long been compliant with the criterion on long-term interest rates. Since 2006, domestic long-term interest rates have even been below those in the euro area countries. This mainly reflects the long-standing low-inflation environment in the Czech economy. The long-term interest rate criterion should be fulfilled in the future with no problem, provided that the Czech Republic succeeds in fulfilling the other convergence criteria.

Since the adoption of the Strategy, the Czech Republic has continued to apply a floating exchange rate under a monetary policy regime of inflation targeting. Under this regime, the koruna exchange rate is determined by market supply and demand and the CNB intervenes on the foreign exchange market only in exceptional situations3.  The exchange rate has continued to show a gradual nominal appreciation tendency since the Strategy was adopted. The previous process of catching-up with the price level of the advanced EU countries through the exchange rate and inflation channels has created conditions for balanced fulfilment of the convergence criteria for inflation and interest rates.

The stabilisation of inflation at a low level amid low interest rates and strong economic growth can thus be considered positive in terms of fulfilling the Strategy, as can the increasing openness and competitiveness of the Czech economy. By contrast, the evolution of public finances and the lack of reforms aimed at delivering balanced public sector accounts in the long run and making the Czech economy, and especially the labour market, more flexible, can be viewed as unfavourable. This is reflected in failure to fulfil the original ambitions of the Strategy regarding the date of adoption of the euro in the Czech Republic.

The original time frame for introducing the euro around 2009–2010 required that attention be given to the practical preparations for the changeover. In November 2005, the Government of the Czech Republic established the office of National Coordinator of the Introduction of the euro. Subsequently, a National Coordination Group for the Introduction of the euro was set up. This body prepared a draft scenario for a single-step transition to the euro (approved by the Government in October 2006) and a National Euro Changeover Plan for the Czech Republic (approved by the Government in April 2007). The National Plan covers the technical, organisational, legal and communication aspects of the preparedness of the Czech economy for the introduction and use of the euro for businesses, the public and the state administration.

At this stage, the actions of the National Plan are structured independently of the specific changeover date and are thus conceived as a set of tasks to be implemented within a specific time limit before €-day (the euro adoption date). The tasks, arranged in terms of time sequence, show that it is necessary to allow at least three years for the technical preparations from the logistical perspective. These preparations thus need to start virtually as soon as the decision is made to join ERM II. The costs associated with the changeover will not be covered from the public funds and will be borne by each private entity itself. For that reason, the target date must be set in such a way that it is sufficiently credible and gives all those involved the chance to plan their expenses efficiently.

Developments in the EU since the Strategy was adopted

The introduction of the euro in 1999 was connected with expectations of strong pro-growth impulses, although these were conditional on the implementation of structural reforms. However, many euro area countries failed to make sufficient efforts to implement the necessary reforms. This, coupled with an adverse phase of the business cycle, led to a slowdown in euro area economic growth. The economic stagnation in the euro area chiefly reflected problems in its main national economies, as some smaller countries achieved favourable economic results even in this environment. At present, the euro area is in an upward phase of the business cycle, which is also being reflected in a marked increase in job creation. The experience with the adjustment mechanisms under the single monetary policy thus shows that the economic success of the euro area countries depends primarily on their domestic economic policies. In order for the euro area to operate successfully, these policies should focus on enhancing market flexibility and efficiency. This is an important message for Czech economic policy.

The euro has been reinforcing its position as a credible global currency. It has gradually appreciated in recent years following an initial depreciation linked with uncertainty regarding the efficiency of the institutional setup in the euro area and rapid economic growth in the United States. In addition to economic factors, the ongoing appreciation of the euro against the dollar is underpinned by rising confidence in the ECB, the euro and the potential of the euro area economy. Owing to EU enlargement and the growing credibility of the euro, the share of the euro in the foreign trade transactions of many countries and in the international reserves of many central banks is increasing.

A revision of the Stability and Growth Pact was approved in 2005, setting different medium-term budgetary objectives for individual countries and putting an emphasis on fiscal consolidation in good times. The Czech Republic set itself this objective as a public budget deficit of 1% of GDP, to be achieved in 2012 according to the Convergence Programme. Most of the EU Member States, which have faced widening fiscal imbalances in recent years, have adopted a series of measures leading to a gradual improvement in their public budgets. Of the new EU Member States, only the Czech Republic and Hungary expect their fiscal development to fall short of their obligations under the Stability and Growth Pact in the near future.

The approaches of the new EU Members States, which have not adopted the euro so far but are obliged to do so in the future, remain mixed. Seven out of the ten new Member States that joined the EU on 1 May 2004 opted for a strategy of adopting the euro as soon as possible (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Malta, Cyprus, Slovakia and Slovenia). Consequently, these countries (including Slovenia, which joined the euro area in 2007) joined ERM II as early as 2004 and 2005. However, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia were forced to delay their plans for euro area entry and have not set new official dates so far. Malta and Cyprus are planning to adopt the euro at the beginning of 2008 and have already received the approval of European institutions. Slovakia is intending to join the euro area at the beginning of 2009. Like the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland opted to participate in ERM II only for the shortest period necessary to fulfil the exchange rate criterion and make technical preparations for the euro. As in the case of the Czech Republic, the entry of these two countries into ERM II will depend on their expected euro adoption date. However, neither country has set such a date so far. Poland and Hungary are not expected to adopt the euro until 2012 and 2014 respectively. Bulgaria and Romania, which joined the EU in the most recent wave of enlargement, have relatively ambitious plans regarding euro area entry. Bulgaria intends to enter ERM II as soon as possible, and Romania has set 2014 as its target date for euro adoption.

Slovenia’s changeover to the euro in January 2007 went smoothly from the technical point of view. Slovenia also experienced a temporary rise in perceived inflation, which deviated from actually measured inflation, but this deviation was smaller in scale than that recorded during the cash changeover in the countries of the “first wave”. According to preliminary analyses, the transition to euro cash in Slovenia can be assessed as a successful policy, based on active and thorough preparation from the technical and organisational points of view.

By contrast, the “old” Member States standing outside the euro area – Denmark and the United Kingdom, which have an opt-out clause, and Sweden, which rejected the euro in a referendum – are not planning to adopt the euro any time soon and are insisting that the euro must be approved in a referendum (and – in the UK – also by the government and parliament). Nevertheless, Denmark has participated in ERM II since 1999, maintaining a fluctuation band of ±2.25% around the central rate on a voluntary basis without experiencing any significant problems.

Lithuania’s application to join the euro area, submitted in 2006, was turned down owing to its narrow failure to meet the inflation criterion and its adverse outlook for inflation. This example shows that the European authorities (the European Commission, Ecofin and the ECB) apply a strict interpretation of the Maastricht convergence criteria and the other conditions for euro adoption when assessing applicant countries. Besides the strictly legal viewpoint, this interpretation places an emphasis on sustainable fulfilment of the economic criteria after euro adoption.

The ability of the Czech economy to operate in the euro area

To benefit from the introduction of the euro, the Czech economy must show a high degree of economic convergence, integration and alignment with the euro area. After the loss of independent monetary policy, flexibility and the ability to adjust quickly to economic shocks will be crucial for maintaining the good performance of the Czech economy. This was already pointed out in the 2003 Strategy. While some of these required features of the Czech economy have been in place for a long time, a need for further improvement is clearly visible in other areas.

The factors supporting the introduction of the euro include the high and increasing openness of the Czech economy and its close trade links with the euro area. The euro area accounts for 60% of Czech exports and 50% of Czech imports, while the EU as a whole accounts for more than 85% of Czech exports and 70% of Czech imports. The Czech economy is also characterised by high direct investment inflows from the euro area. The Czech economy’s strong economic integration with the euro area creates preconditions for increased cyclical alignment with this area.

The Czech financial sector remains considerably smaller in relation to GDP than the euro area average, but the two sectors are now relatively similar in terms of structure. In the Czech Republic, the ratio of loans to GDP has been rising recently as a result of strong growth in loans to households and corporations. Loan portfolio quality and profitability in the banking sector have increased in recent years. Capital adequacy is falling slightly but remains sufficient for now. The Czech banking sector is currently stable and resilient to external shocks, although this resilience has not yet been tested by adverse economic conditions.

Another important step forward by comparison with 2003 is the significant convergence of the Czech Republic’s economic level towards the euro area average. GDP per capita at purchasing power parity remains higher in the Czech Republic than in most new EU Member States, slightly exceeding 70% of the euro area average in 2006. The economic level of the Czech Republic can be expected to rise further in the coming years, thereby reducing the difference from the euro area average. The higher degree of real convergence is fostering convergence of the price level, thus reducing the future pressures for equilibrium appreciation of the real exchange rate, which would result in an inflation differential against the euro area average after euro adoption and thereby lower domestic real interest rates.

Despite the observed convergence, the difference in the price level compared to the euro area remains relatively sizeable. In 2005, the Czech price level was roughly 56% of the euro area average and 58% of the EU average. Hourly labour costs were about 27% of the euro area average and 31% of the EU average. The process of real convergence and the growth in the relative price and wage levels are likely to continue.

As regards aggregate economic activity, a significant difference can still be seen between the business cycle in the Czech Republic and that in the euro area, with no significant alignment taking place. Alignment with the euro area also remains low as regards macroeconomic shocks on the demand and supply sides. The difference in the evolution of the two economies in recent years has been due partly to the pick-up in economic growth in the Czech Republic, which chiefly reflects changes on the supply side of the economy.

From the structural point of view, the Czech economy also still differs from the euro area average in having a higher share of industry, which has continued to grow moderately in recent years, and a smaller share of services in GDP. However, a relatively high degree of cyclical alignment can be observed for industrial activity.

The current state of public finances in the Czech Republic still greatly limits the room for their macroeconomic stabilising effect. Although the public budget deficits have decreased since 2003, they have remained relatively high despite the rapid economic growth, and the outlook for the near future is rather unfavourable. The deficits are largely structural in nature, reducing the scope for the functioning of automatic stabilisers and, in the extreme case, for the implementation of discretionary measures during economic downturns.

The employment rate is rising and total unemployment is falling, chiefly as a consequence of the buoyant economic growth in 2005 and 2006. These indicators are better than both the EU and euro area averages. However, relatively high long-term and structural unemployment remains a serious problem. To a large extent, the growing demand for labour is thus being satisfied due only to a rising number of foreigners. This flexible feature of the Czech labour market is only partly compensating for its overall rigidity. The mobility of the domestic labour force is generally low and the full liberalisation of labour movement between the Czech Republic and all the old EU Member States in 2011 can be expected to generate only a partial improvement in this area. The rather low flexibility of real wages is also a problem; no significant changes have taken place in this area recently. The overall ability of the Czech labour market to absorb shocks thus remains limited and efforts must be made to enhance it.

As regards the institutional setup of the labour market, some favourable and unfavourable changes have occurred since the Strategy was prepared. Increases in the minimum wage have led to a rise in its share in the average wage in recent years. On the one hand, this is reducing the demand for people with low skills. On the other hand, together with certain other factors, especially a tightening of the conditions for claiming benefits, it has resulted in a moderate positive shift in the motivation of the unemployed to seek work since 2005. However, insufficient alignment of the tax and benefit systems remains a serious structural problem. There is a relatively large number of inactive persons who are insufficiently motivated to accept low-paid work. As regards labour law, the conditions for temporary and secondary employment have been tightened somewhat and the conditions for fixed-term employment contracts have been relaxed slightly since 2003. However, the institutional rules are still failing to create good conditions for the employment of people with low skills and for the entry of young people onto the labour market. There has been a partial improvement in the regulatory environment for doing business, but by international comparison it remains hampered by major administrative obstacles.

Economic policy challenges and euro adoption prospects in the Czech Republic

The economic policy priority associated with the adoption of the euro in the Czech Republic is fulfilment of the Maastricht criteria. In this area, fiscal policy and the state of public finances are absolutely key areas where fundamental measures need to be taken towards sustainable fulfilment of the convergence criteria. The excessive deficit procedure needs to be ended without delay so that the Czech Republic can restore its credibility as soon as possible and prove that the consolidation process under way is capable of keeping the public finance deficit below 3% of GDP. Conditions for achieving this objective must be created in the state budget for 2008.

In this context, the Government and the CNB are aware of the need for further fiscal reforms going beyond those previously approved by the Government for the first phase of fiscal consolidation. That phase represents merely the first step towards sustainable public finances. There is a need to implement further and much deeper changes, especially on the expenditure side of the public budgets. Those changes must reflect the challenges arising in particular from demographic changes (reform of the pension and health care systems), from growth in social benefit expenditure and from the generally high proportion of legally prescribed (mandatory) expenditures.

However, fulfilment of the Maastricht fiscal criteria should in no way be regarded as a sufficiently ambitious goal for the fiscal reforms in the medium term. The only sufficiently ambitious goal is to provably target the public finance deficit – at a rate of at least 0.5% of GDP a year – well below the value of the Maastricht convergence criterion towards fulfilment of the obligation arising under the revised Stability and Growth Pact. In the Czech Republic’s case, this means heading in the medium term towards a structural (cyclically adjusted) public budget deficit of no more than 1% of GDP. Only in this situation will it be possible to consider state fiscal policy as sufficiently able to effectively perform its macroeconomic stabilising role following the loss of independent monetary policy.

In the monetary policy area, the preconditions for achieving the relevant Maastricht convergence criteria have largely been put in place. In March 2007, the CNB announced a new inflation target of 2% for annual CPI inflation (with a tolerance band of ± 1 percentage point), effective from January 2010. At the same time, it announced that it would allow inflation to descend gradually to the new inflation target far enough in advance so that inflation is close to the target by the date it takes effect. The lowering of the inflation target primarily reflected the longer-term perspective for the operation of the inflation targeting regime in the Czech Republic due to the postponement of the euro adoption date beyond the originally envisaged horizon of 2010 and the currently low inflation in the Czech economy, manifesting itself in inflation expectations anchored at low levels. The new inflation target is simultaneously consistent with the practice of advanced countries and its level corresponds to the rate of inflation that the ECB views as the threshold with regard to the maintenance of price stability. Lower inflation in the Czech Republic in line with the new target furthermore increases the chances of satisfying the Maastricht price stability criterion in the future and will be accompanied in the long run by lower nominal interest rates, thereby also increasing the probability of future fulfilment of the interest rate criteria while not endangering the fulfilment of the exchange rate criteria.

The CNB will continue to apply ex ante exemptions to the impacts of changes to indirect taxes, i.e. it will focus its monetary policy decision-making on hitting the target for inflation adjusted for the first-round effects of such tax changes (referred to as “monetary policy-relevant inflation”). However, during the ERM II participation period, which is simultaneously the reference period for the price stability criterion, this system of escape clauses should preferably be no longer necessary and headline inflation ought to gradually merge with monetary policy-relevant inflation. This will be the case only if no major changes are made to indirect taxes during this period. In the event of major tax changes, the CNB would not be able to ensure fulfilment of the price stability criterion by means of monetary policy.

Increasing the flexibility of the Czech economy remains another challenge for economic policy and for the future sustainability of the benefits of adopting the euro in the Czech Republic. Some degree of difference in the structural and cyclical properties of the economy will persist even after the single European currency is adopted. Given the non-existence of independent interest-rate and exchange-rate policy instruments, the effectiveness of the economy’s internal adjustment mechanisms will thus play a key role in mitigating asymmetric shocks. In addition to the insufficient stabilising role of public finances, the Czech economy’s main bottleneck in this area is its still limited ability to adjust flexibly in the labour market and partially also in the product market.

As in numerous euro area countries, the Czech labour market suffers from insufficient flexibility, reflecting strict employment protection regulations, a rising minimum wage and high labour taxation. Its insufficiently aligned tax and benefit system creates a demotivating environment, especially for the long-term unemployed in low-income families with children. A high ratio of social benefits to incomes in low-income households is also having a negative impact on the stabilising ability of fiscal policy. Enhancing the flexibility of the labour market by increasing the mobility of the Czech labour force also remains a challenge.

The entrepreneurial environment in the Czech Republic is still being hampered by administrative obstacles, which are high by international comparison. The main problems are the high administrative costs of starting up a business and generally complicated regulatory and bureaucratic processes, which are reducing the competitive pressures on product markets and in the long run adversely affecting job creation and employment. The flexibility of the economy is also being compromised by deficiencies in the legislation and the long time it takes to resolve legal disputes. These reservations, although they affect the introduction of the euro, also relate generally to the Czech Republic’s activities in the EU and the international community as a whole.

ERM II entry is still viewed as only a necessary condition for adoption of the euro, hence the Czech Republic’s stay in ERM II should be kept to the minimum required length of time. In line with the previous Strategy, the decision to join this system must be based on an assessment of the outlook for the fulfilment of the Maastricht criteria as well as an assessment of the degree of economic alignment with the euro area. To retain the option of deciding flexibly on the adoption of the euro, it would be appropriate to continue conducting these evaluations at yearly intervals using the existing analytical tools.

However, given the interrelated nature of the factors affecting the Czech economy’s ability to operate in the environment of the single European currency, and given the other restrictions of the assessment criteria, it is impossible to identify specific “sufficient” values or to draw up an overall indicator of economic preparedness for adopting the euro. Naturally, such a measure would not be very credible and might overlook certain important economic factors. The assessment of economic alignment should therefore focus on analysing developments in areas that pose risks – as discussed here – to the smooth running of the economy after the euro changeover and in the context of overall economic developments.

As the Czech Republic’s decision to join ERM II should be made approximately three years ahead of euro area entry, it will be necessary to start making technical, institutional and organisational provision for the euro changeover at roughly the same time, in line with the approved National Changeover Plan.

Based on an overall assessment of the Czech economy’s ability to operate in the euro area, one can say that some of the preconditions for benefiting from the adoption of the single currency have already been met, but others, by contrast, have yet to achieve satisfactory parameters. The main obstacle to the fulfilment of the Maastricht criteria remains the unconsolidated state of public finances. This, coupled with the low flexibility of the economy, and especially the labour market, simultaneously presents a risk to the operation of the Czech economy in the euro area and prevents it from reaping the benefits associated with adopting the euro.

The euro adoption date will therefore depend on resolving these problem areas in a fundamental reform of public finances and on enhancing the flexibility of the Czech economy. The Government therefore sets itself the task of making maximum reform efforts to remove these obstacles by the end of its term of office. 

1 - The exchange rate convergence criterion requires participation in ERM II for at least two years without devaluation of the central rate.
2 - The idea of the Czech Republic staying in ERM II for the minimum required period was adopted by the CNB and published as early as July 2003 in a document entitled ERM II and the Exchange-rate Convergence Criterion.
3 - The CNB has never intervened in the foreign exchange market since the adoption of the Strategy.

The Czech Republic's Euro-area Accession Strategy - 2003

Joint Document of the Czech Government and the Czech National Bank.
Approved by the Government of the Czech Republic on 13 October 2003.

  1. The Czech Republic's process of accession to the European Union is drawing to a successful completion. The negotiations on the financial conditions for accession were completed at the Copenhagen summit in December 2002, and in Athens in April 2003 the Czech Republic's Treaty of Accession was officially signed. Following the referendum on accession held in June 2003, the accession process is to be closed with the ratification of the Treaty of Accession by the parliaments of the EU Member States. The Czech Republic is set to become a Member State of the EU in May 2004.
  2. An integral part of the Czech Republic's accession to the EU is the obligation of subsequently joining the euro area. Given the inevitable policy implementation lags, a credible strategy needs to be established for the Czech Republic's integration into European monetary structures. This strategy will then serve as the basis for each particular economic policy, and in particular for monetary policy. For this reason, the Government in its Policy Statement set itself the task of preparing a euro-area accession strategy in co-operation with the Czech National Bank (CNB).
  3. This document presents the joint and co-ordinated approach of the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Industry and Trade and the CNB to the basic issues associated with the Czech Republic's entry into the Economic and Monetary Union. It summarises the starting points for the Czech Republic's integration into European monetary structures and discusses the positive effects and potential risks associated with joining the euro area. The document recommends that the Czech Republic join the euro area as soon as economic conditions allow for doing so. The timing therefore depends to a large extent on the speed of the real convergence process, achieved by means of structural reforms, and on the nominal convergence process, especially on a rigorous fiscal consolidation.

The Starting Points for Joining the Euro Area

  1. The Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) was implemented in three stages on the basis of the Maastricht Treaty. During the first stage, starting in 1990, the liberalisation of capital flows was completed and a single internal market was created. The second stage, starting in 1994, focused on making progress on convergence of the Member States' economies. The third stage involved introducing the non-cash euro and launching the single monetary policy of the European Central Bank (ECB), which sets a single interest rate for the entire euro area. The process of monetary integration was completed by the introduction of euro banknotes and coins into circulation in January 2002.
  2. Economic integration within EMU is founded on the euro and on co-ordination of economic and budgetary policies both mutually and among the Member States. This co-ordination is achieved by means of multilateral surveillance of such polices. The formation of excessive budget deficits is prevented by the Treaty establishing the European Community and the Stability and Growth Pact (see Box 1). Within these relatively narrow confines, fiscal policy is left to the discretion of the individual EMU Member States.

BOX 1: Budget Deficits of the EU Member States

Article 104 of the Treaty establishing the European Community sets forth that Member States must avoid excessive government deficits. The decision on whether an excessive deficit exists is made by the European Council based on a report presented by the Commission. Where the existence of an excessive deficit is declared, the Council makes recommendations to the Member State concerned with a view to bringing that situation to an end. The recommendations of the Council are not made public unless the Member State fails to respond to the recommendations within the period laid down. In addition, under the Stability and Growth Pact financial sanctions may be imposed on euro-area Member States in the form of either a non-interest-bearing deposit requirement or - after two years of the decision to impose sanctions, unless the excessive deficit has in the view of the Council been corrected - a fine. 

  1. In 1999, eleven countries satisfied the conditions for adopting the euro and consequently established the euro area. They were joined by Greece in 2001. The United Kingdom and Denmark, which at the start of the Maastricht process insisted on an opt-out clause, are not currently part of the euro area. Despite not having an opt-out clause, Sweden also currently remains outside the euro area for domestic political reasons.
  2. When it joins the EU, the Czech Republic will automatically participate in the third stage of EMU. It will acquire the status of "Member State with a derogation" regarding the adoption of the euro, i.e. it will not be a member of the euro area in this stage. Upon EU accession, the CNB will become a member of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB). After the Czech Republic adopts the euro, the CNB will become part of the Eurosystem, which consists of the ECB and the national central banks of the euro-area Member States.
  3. Under the EU legislation, prior to adopting the euro the Czech Republic must therefore be an EU Member State and must have fulfilled the Maastricht convergence criteria (see Box 2), including compatibility between its legal rules and EU law on EMU. The European legislation does not explicitly stipulate a date for adopting the euro or for fulfilling the convergence criteria. Nonetheless, the Czech Republic will have to document periodically the progress of its economy towards fulfilment of the Maastricht criteria in its Convergence Programme.

BOX 2: The Convergence Criteria

The criterion on price stability requires that a Member State has a price performance that is sustainable and an average rate of inflation, observed over a period of one year before the examination, that does not exceed by more than 1.5 percentage points that of, at most, the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability.

The criterion on long-term interest rates requires that, observed over a period of one year before the examination, a Member State has had an average nominal long-term interest rate that does not exceed by more than 2 percentage points that of, at most, the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability.

The criterion on the government budgetary position means that a Member State has a ratio of planned or actual government deficit to GDP that does not exceed 3%, unless:

  • either the ratio has declined substantially and continuously and reached a level that comes close to the reference value,
  • or, alternatively, the excess of the reference value is only exceptional and temporary and the ratio remains close to the reference value.

The criterion on government debt means that a Member State has a ratio of government debt to GDP that does not exceed 60%, unless the ratio is sufficiently diminishing and approaching the reference value at a satisfactory pace.

The exchange rate convergence criterion requires participation for at least two years in the ERM II and observance of the normal fluctuation margins close to central parity provided for by the mechanism for at least two years.

  1. The convergence required for entering the euro area is formally assessed according to the procedure laid down in the EU Treaty. The final decision is subsequently made by a summit of EU Member States acting on the recommendation of the ECOFIN Council. Those Member States whose economic conditions are assessed as a potential threat to the maintenance of price stability in the euro area will not be able to join the monetary union and will retain the status of Member States with a derogation. These countries will have to wait before they can benefit from euro-area membership and will be at a comparative disadvantage relative to the new euro-area members.
  2. The exchange rate convergence criterion requires two-year participation in the ERMII and at the same time movement of the exchange rate close to its central parity. The central parity and fluctuation band within the ERM II will - after being agreed upon between the CNB and the Government - be discussed with the ECB and the Commission and subsequently approved by the ECOFIN Council. In July 2003, the CNB prepared a document entitled ERM II and the Exchange-rate Convergence Criterion containing a detailed argumentation of the current position as information for the Czech Government and the public. Given that participation in the ERM II - unlike the irrevocable fixing of the exchange rate within a monetary union - does not in itself eliminate the risk of currency turbulence, it is regarded merely as the gateway into the euro area. The Government and the CNB agree that staying in the ERM II for longer than the minimum required period of two years does not seem desirable.

The Positive Effects and Risks of Euro-area Participation

Expected Positive Effects

  1. The Czech Republic's entry into the euro area will complete the Czech economy's process of integration into European monetary structures. The Czech Republic will be able to participate fully in formulating and implementing the single European monetary and exchange rate policy, which aims to strengthen macroeconomic stability in Europe.
  2. Membership of the euro area should have positive impacts on domestic economic policy, since the key elements of the system are requirements to achieve balanced public budgets in the medium term and undertake structural reforms supporting long-term sustainable economic growth.
  3. Fiscal policy implemented in accordance with the Stability and Growth Pact will reduce the costs of financing public budgets and lead to stabilisation of long-term interest rates at a low level. Corporations and households will profit not only from low interest rates, but also from access to the deeper, more liquid and more transparent capital markets of the euro area.
  4. The irrevocable fixing of the currency within EMU will increase the stability of the financial sector and reduce the risks of monetary turbulence. Sharp fluctuations in the exchange rate present a significant threat to a small open economy in an environment of liberalised capital flows.
  5. The domestic enterprise sector in particular will profit from the elimination of exchange rate risk vis-a-vis the euro-area countries, which are the Czech Republic's most important trading partners. These benefits will show up as a decline in transaction and hedging costs and a reduction in investment uncertainty. The household sector will profit from greater price transparency, which stimulates competition.
  6. These positive effects will foster a more stable environment for entrepreneurship, more efficient allocation of resources and subsequently higher economic growth. Euro-area membership may thus further speed up the Czech economy's real convergence towards the EU average.

Potential Risks

  1. The Czech Republic's entry into the euro area is associated not only with numerous advantages, but also with some risks, the intensity of which will change over time. These risks are connected primarily with the response of the economy to economic disturbances under the irrevocably fixed exchange rate within the euro area. In the event of insufficient cyclical and structural alignment of the Czech economy and its financial sector with the euro-area economies, economic shocks may have unequal and asymmetric impacts.
  2. For the economic policy of the Czech Republic, the loss of independent monetary policy will mean a loss of important instruments that could help to mitigate the negative effects of distinct economic developments at home and abroad and thus facilitate economic convergence. In the run-up to euro-area entry, economic policy will, already in this phase, have to be targeted at achieving rapid economic convergence and at improving the Czech economy's ability to respond, so as to lower the risk of a slowdown in economic growth brought about by asymmetric shocks and their impacts. Although the characteristics of the Czech economy have since the beginning of the transformation converged towards those of the EU Member States, some misalignment of economic cycles and structural discrepancies will remain even after it joins the euro area. Of key importance for ensuring the Czech economy's ability to respond are a stabilising fiscal policy, flexibility on the labour and products markets, and well-functioning financial markets.
  3. On the other hand, fulfilment of the conditions and full applicability of the Stability and Growth Pact will require, in addition to a strengthening of the automatic stabilisation effect of fiscal policy, a tightening of fiscal policy in order to ensure the long-term sustainability of balanced public finances. Public finances are a potential barrier to the entry into the euro area not only because of the excessive deficits, but also because of inadequate structural adjustment, especially on the expenditure side. Fiscal policy must not only be ready to fulfil its macroeconomic stabilisation function, but also be consistent with other structural policies supporting the competitiveness of the Czech economy within the single market.
  4. The decision to fix the exchange rate irrevocably and adopt the single monetary policy can only be made when sustainable convergence of the economy and of macroeconomic and microeconomic policies have been achieved (opening of markets, competitiveness within the single market, and increasing economic integration and functioning of institutions on the products, services and capital markets).

Economic alignment

  1. The characteristics of the Czech economy have been gradually converging towards those of the EU Member States. Trade with the EU accounts for about two-thirds of the total foreign trade of the Czech economy, and the inflow of foreign direct investment from the EU accounts for as much as four-fifths of all the investment flowing into the Czech economy. Nevertheless, the Czech economic cycle is less aligned with the cycle in the euro area than is that of the average euro-area Member State. In the area of alignment of the real economy and financial sector structures, too, there is room for further improvement.
  2. The sufficiency of economic alignment over time and in international comparison can be assessed, for example, by analysing the correlation of the economic cycle with the euro-area countries, by analysing the correlation of demand and supply shocks between the Czech economy and the euro-area economies, or by evaluating structural similarity on the basis of the shares of individual sectors in total value added or on the basis of a set of criteria related to the Czech Republic's international trade and financial sector linkages with the euro-area countries.

Fiscal consolidation

  1. The Czech Republic's large public budgets deficits, together with the built-in trends towards a further structural widening of those deficits and inadequate conditions for the symmetrical functioning of automatic stabilisers, represent a serious barrier to effective fiscal stabilisation policy. The aim of fiscal consolidation must be not only to fulfil the Maastricht criteria, but also - in compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact - to achieve in the medium term balanced public budgets facilitating the effective action of automatic stabilisers and flexibility of discretionary expenditure. In the absence of an autonomous monetary policy, fiscal policy will - given the irrevocably fixed exchange rate within the euro area - be the key instrument of macroeconomic stabilisation.
  2. An insufficiently consolidated public finance system could have particularly adverse effects during the Czech Republic's participation in the ERM II and in the first few years after it enters the euro area. During this period, the probability of the Czech economic cycle diverging from that elsewhere in the euro area will be higher than in later years. The cyclical misalignment may be reinforced by progress with structural reforms, manifesting themselves as supply shocks with effects on potential output. Moreover, given unified nominal interest rates, the expected positive inflation differential between the Czech Republic and the euro-area average in this period will result in lower real interest rates, which could trigger excessive growth in domestic demand. Therefore, in the years immediately following the Czech Republic's entry into the euro area, prudent fiscal policy will be a key condition for maintaining sustainable economic growth.
  3. In response to the long-running unfavourable fiscal situation, the Government has in the course of 2003 prepared and approved a three-year consolidation programme aimed at reducing the public budgets deficit to no more than 4% of GDP by 2006. The consolidation hinges on reductions in public expenditure and a modest rise in the overall tax quota. Together with the proposed series of expenditure and revenue measures, some changes have also been made to the framework within which fiscal processes take place. The principle of medium-term fiscal targeting - implemented by means of binding aggregate three-year expenditure frameworks - has been introduced.
  4. The launch of the fiscal balance renewal process will help the Czech economy to move towards a position in which it will be able to aspire to adopt the euro. This is, however, only the first stage and must be followed by another stage of further reductions in public budget deficits resulting from the implementation of more profound structural reforms. To realise all the benefits of the single currency, eliminate the potential risks and ensure the sound operation of the economy before and after the euro is adopted, it is thus vital to continue with the work already commenced and to steer the fiscal system toward balanced positions.
  5. Fulfilling the Maastricht budget criterion alone is not enough. This is clearly documented by the economic difficulties currently being experienced by certain EU Member States who in the past failed to take full advantage of the opportunity to achieve fiscal balance. The need to establish sufficient room for manoeuvre in the fiscal system is underlined by the fact that, as early as in the second half of this decade, the public budgets will start feeling the effects of adverse demographic pressures. Furthermore, radical consolidation is necessary because the budget system will, particularly in the first years after accession, have to find sufficient resources to finance necessary infrastructure investments, which will in turn facilitate the process of real economic convergence.
  6. A crucial factor for fiscal policymaking, as well as from the point of view of fulfilling the future EU membership obligations in the area of co-ordination and surveillance procedures, will be the quality of all the national economic statistical data. If these data are not of a high enough standard (with respect to timeliness, reliability, stability and transparency) it will be difficult to correctly understand and evaluate the economic situation and prepare corrective measures. The statistical data are moreover the cornerstone of all the co-ordination and surveillance procedures. Inadequate national economic statistics and government financial statistics are another potential ("technical") barrier to entry into the euro area.
  7. The appropriate methods for assessing progress with public finance consolidation include, for example, analysis of the sensitivity of built-in stabilisers by assessing the impacts of GDP fluctuations on the public budgets, analysis of the public budgets' room for manoeuvre for discretionary policy based on the budget structure, or international comparisons of the public budget deficits and the cyclical position of the economy.

The labour market

  1. Like the labour market in the EU, the Czech labour market is characterised by relatively low mobility and flexibility of the labour force. Moreover, for several years following accession, restrictions on the free movement of labour from the new member states have to be reckoned with. To strengthen the adjustment mechanisms on the labour market, steps must be taken to increase the flexibility of the labour market and real wages not only in the institutional area, but also in areas such as transport infrastructure and the housing market.
  2. The degree of labour market flexibility can be assessed, for example, by evaluating the inter-regional mobility of the population, by analysing the variance in regional unemployment rates, by analysing wage flexibility, by evaluating the share of the long-term unemployed in the total number of people unemployed, or by evaluating the structure of employment.

Euro-area Accession Strategy

  1. Under the European legislation, the Czech Republic's entry into the euro area is tied to its accession to the EU. Membership of the euro area will enable the Czech Republic to participate fully in formulating and implementing the single European monetary and exchange rate policy and will lead to a strengthening of the macroeconomic stability of the Czech economy.
  2. From the procedural point of view, assuming that the Czech Republic enters the EU in 2004 and fulfils the Maastricht convergence criteria, the first theoretically possible year for joining the euro area is 2007. Given that the ERM II is to be regarded merely as the gateway to joining the euro area, with a maximum participation period of two years, the decision on the timing of the euro's introduction hinges on the outlook for the fulfilment of the other convergence criteria and on the evaluation of the Czech economy's degree of alignment with the euro-area economies. In other words, the Czech Republic should enter the ERM II only after conditions have been established which enable it to introduce the euro at the time of the assessment of the exchange-rate criterion (two years after joining the ERM II) and to then benefit from its introduction without experiencing any problems.
  3. The preparedness of the Czech Republic for ERM II participation and euro-area accession will be assessed each year not only with respect to fulfilment of the formal entry criteria, but also by means of detailed economic analyses. Specifically, during the drafting and discussing of the Convergence Programmes, the Government will each autumn receive an assessment of the Czech economy's current and expected fulfilment of the Maastricht convergence criteria and an assessment of the degree of the Czech economy's alignment with the euro area. On the basis of this assessment, the CNB and the Ministry of Finance will propose to the Government a decision on whether to initiate the procedure that will take the koruna into the ERM II. Given the intention to participate in the ERM II for the obligatory two years only, the decision to join the ERM II will also imply the date for euro-area entry, i.e. the introduction of the euro in the Czech Republic.
  4. This year's assessment was made during the summer months as part of the preparation of the Pre-accession Economic Programme for 2003. Under the EU legislation, and given the Czech Republic's position with respect to the ERM II mechanism, the country's potential participation in ERM II as from May 2004, i.e. its expected date of accession to the EU (the earliest possible date), would imply the assessment of the exchange-rate convergence criterion taking place sometime around June 2006. However, the current outlook for the fulfilment of Maastricht convergence criteria, which takes into account the approved plan to reform public finances, does not indicate that the public budget deficit criterion will be fulfilled by this date. This means that the Czech Republic will not be able to join the euro area at the turn of 2007 and that the Czech koruna will stay outside the ERM II after the Czech Republic's expected accession to the EU in May 2004.
  5. The strategic goal of the Government and the CNB is to lay the groundwork for introducing the euro in the Czech Republic. The Government's economic strategy will be to support economic growth, maintain macroeconomic stability, ensure long-term corporate competitiveness and raise employment while reducing the high long-term unemployment rate. In the fiscal area, the Government will, during the current electoral term, prepare the next stage of the fiscal reform in such a way that fulfilment of the Maastricht fiscal criteria is not based on one-off revenues or cuts but is the result of gradual reform steps and far-reaching structural reforms.
  6. Until the monetary integration process has been completed, independent Czech monetary policy will continue to be implemented by means of the inflation targeting strategy. Within this system, the inflation targets will be directed at fulfilling the Maastricht convergence criteria on price stability and long-term interest rates.
  7. Sufficient alignment of the Czech economy with the euro-area economies in the real and financial spheres, flexible fiscal policy and a well-functioning labour market will be of key importance for the future smooth functioning of the economy within the ERM II and after the subsequent introduction of the euro, when the Czech Republic will give up its autonomous monetary policy. To achieve further progress in these areas, the Czech Republic needs to further deepen the structural reforms directed at increasing the flexibility of the Czech economy and to implement the second stage of the consolidation of its public finance system based on structural reforms of public finances.
  8. Provided that the Maastricht criteria are fulfilled, including a successful consolidation of public finances, a sufficient level of real convergence is achieved and adequate progress is made with structural reforms guaranteeing sufficient economic alignment with the EU Member States, the Czech Republic can be expected to join the euro area around 2009-2010.